Skip to content
ASdrawn

Gauge R&R calculator

The AIAG MSA manual’s example study, three appraisers measuring ten parts three times, gives a gauge R&R of 26.7 % of the total variation and 5 distinct categories: may be acceptable, depending on the use. Paste your own readings, one line per appraiser and trial, for repeatability, reproducibility and part variation by the Average and Range or ANOVA method, with each range checked against the control limit. Or check whether a measured value, with its uncertainty, proves a part in or out of tolerance.

Work out
Appraisers
Trials
Method

10 %30 %

May be acceptable (10 to 30 %)

%GRR
GRR, EV, AV
0.3058 · 0.2019 · 0.2297σ
PV, TV
1.1046 · 1.1461σ
Distinct categories
5 (5.09)
%GRR of tolerance
Enter a tolerance
Ranges over UCL
B part 4: 1.02
How it’s calculated

EV = R̿·K1; AV = √((X̄diff·K2)² − EV²/(n·r)), 0 if negative; GRR = √(EV² + AV²); PV = Rp·K3; TV = √(GRR² + PV²). Each is a standard deviation, so the percentages of TV do not add up to 100. ndc = 1.41·PV/GRR, cut to a whole number. Against the tolerance, %GRR = 100·6·GRR/TOL. One line per appraiser and trial (A1, A2, A3, then B), the parts across.

Appraisers

AppraiserAverage X̄Average range R̄Largest range
A0.19030.18400.35
B0.06830.51301.02
C-0.25430.32800.67

What does %GRR mean?

It is the gauge’s own spread, repeatability and reproducibility together, as a share of the spread it has to tell apart: the parts’ total variation, or the tolerance. Under 10 % the gauge is generally fine; 10 to 30 % may be acceptable for some uses; over 30 % it needs improving. Each component is a standard deviation, so the percentages do not add up to 100. The number of distinct categories says how many groups of parts the gauge can reliably tell apart: five or more for process control.

Secondary verifiedVerify against the governing standard before you rely on a number.Sources

AIAG MSA 2010 (4th edition): the Average and Range method and its constants, the ANOVA method and the acceptance guidance, as reproduced in the sources below

SPC for Excel (BPI Consulting), Three Ways to Analyze a Gage R&R Study (2015): the example's readings and results (retrieved 2026-10-21)

Minitab, crossed gage R&R example and GageData: the same readings and ANOVA results (retrieved 2026-10-21)

AIAG, MSA 4th edition errata, page 88: the tolerance as TV's alternative (retrieved 2026-10-21)

Unistat users' guide 9.3.8 and RTX supplier PPAP toolbox study case 1: the readings, cross-checked 90 of 90

Limitation: The standard-deviation basis of the 3rd and 4th editions. Results from the 1st and 2nd editions' constants are 5.15 times these; the percentages of TV are the same.

Limitation: ndc is cut to a whole number, as Minitab and SPC for Excel do; the raw value is shown beside it.

Limitation: GRR measures repeatability and reproducibility under the study's conditions. It is not a measurement uncertainty: use the conformance decision with U from a full uncertainty budget.

Values follow the governing standard, which is authoritative for production and inspection decisions.

Standard names are trademarks of their respective owners; ASdrawn is not affiliated with or endorsed by any standards body.